USPTO serial 74432960
INTERMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Meehan
THOMAS A MEEHAN BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE1130 EDISON PLZTOLEDO, OH 43604-1537UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | subacute and rehabilitative health care services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |