Drawing for SUPERGEN

USPTO serial 74434023

SUPERGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCINI, CYNTHIA H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth E. Krosin

KENNETH E KROSIN LOWE, PRICE, LEBLANC & BECKERSTE 30099 CANAL CTR PLZALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040custom manufacturer for others of pharmaceuticals for the treatment of human disease and diagnostics for the diagonosis of human diseaseABANDONEDOct 31, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 1997EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 5, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 5, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 15, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 16, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 28, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 21, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance