USPTO serial 74434901
PHOENIX SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHOENIX SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W.R. Langton
DAVID W R LANGTON BERESKIN & PARRSTE 4000 BOX 401 SCOTIA PLZ40 KING WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, personnel, human resource and patient care applications; and micro computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |