Drawing for DYNAWELL

USPTO serial 74434945

DYNAWELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASIELLO, ANTHO
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAWELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan E. Schiavelli

ALAN E SCHIAVELLI ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS1300 N SEVENTEENTH ST STE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013electrical and non-electrical detonators and accessories therefore; namely, shock or signal tubesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2005PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Mar 21, 2005PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 29, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance