USPTO serial 74435348
HITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yeongdeungpo-ku Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Dodd
THOMAS J DODD BAKER & DANIELS205 W JEFFERSON BLVD STE 250SOUTH BEND, IN 46601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |