USPTO serial 74436490
WILD HORSE SALOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILD HORSE SALOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KELLY MAHON TULLIER
KELLY MAHON TULLIER BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded audio and video tapes featuring musical and variety entertainment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHS LICENSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by Nuckolls, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nuckolls, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WILD HORSE SALOON
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |