USPTO serial 74437092
OOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario L6T 4H6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald M. Boles
DONALD M BOLES SIEMENS CORPORATIONINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT186 WOOD AVE SISELIN, NJ 08830Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic industrial control apparatus for heating ventilation air conditioning (HVAC) variable speed drive systems | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 4, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 29, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |