USPTO serial 74437129
STIFEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 1995
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STIFEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
64000 Monter rey, Nuevo Leon, MX
64000 Monter rey, Nuevo Leon, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia Cantarella
CLAUDIA CANTARELLA FRIED FRANK HARRIS SHRIVER & JACOBSONONE NEW YORL PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | rugs, carpets and other textile floor coverings; namely, mats and scatter rugs, linoleum floor coverings, tapestries not of textile, wallpaper not made of textiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 20, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |