USPTO serial 74437160
X.O.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X.O.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DeAnne H. Ozaki
DEANNE H OZAKI PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKERTWENTY-THIRD FL555 S FLOWER STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2371Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | dried and dehydrated coconut extract powder used as food flavoring; frozen snack foods; namely, spring rolls, dimsum and shrimp dumplings; buns; ice cream; instant noodles; instant rice stick; instant rice vermicelli; instant rice flakes; rice flakes; rice vermicelli; rice flour; glutinous rice flour; rice paper; tapioca flour; tapioca starch; sago; rice; chili sauce; sriracha chili sauce; soy sauce; canned fruit extract used as a food flavoring; canned vegetable extract used as a food flavoring; coconut extract used as a food flavoring; fish sauce; dairy based fruit shake; dairy food flavoring; fish sauce; diary based fruit shake; dairy based vegetable shake; and dairy based coconut shake | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |