USPTO serial 74437446
EL CHARRITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2726119Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EL CHARRITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick
JESUS SANCHELIMA SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES PA235 SW LEJEUNE RDMIAMI, FL 33134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | spices; cereal-, rice- or wheat-based snack foods; sauces; processed herbs; teas; rice; flavored ices | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |