USPTO serial 74437528
NULLI SECUNDUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NULLI SECUNDUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire
HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paintings, mounted photographs, posters, hot-stamped laminated boxboard gift boxes, desk sets, playing cards, art etchings, art prints, stationery and publications, namely fiction and non-fiction hardback books | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |