Drawing for CWS CLEAN SEAT

USPTO serial 74437957

CWS CLEAN SEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CWS CLEAN SEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A. Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN & GROSS230 PARK AVE STE 2200NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011installations units, apparatus and accessory parts for sanitary purposes, namely toilet units for sanitary purposes consisting of toilet bowls, toilet seats toilet flushig mechanisms and water closets (cistern); self-cleaning units consisting primarily of a rotating toilet seat which passes through a hygienic cleaning unit sold with toilets or separately; water purifying and filtering units for domestic, commercial and industrial useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 6, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 26, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance