USPTO serial 74438336
ULTIMATE SPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMATE SPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond A. Kurz
RAYMOND A KURZ ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PCSTE 701 E555 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely headwear and T-shirts | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | toys, namely figurines; inflatable sporting equipment, namely hockey sticks, softball and baseball bats, footballs and baseballs and basketballs; vinyl footballs and basketballs; foam novelties, namely toy foam hands; inflatable novelties, namely toy inflatable hands; miniature footballs and basketballs; basketballs; yo-yos; baseball and softball bats; baseballs; softballs; footballs; soccer balls; sports balls; hockey sticks and pucks; bat, ball and tee sets; footbags for playing sports, namely bags which are kicked and/or passed by foot to foot and/or player to player; bean bags | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ace Novelty Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ace Novelty Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ULTIMATE SPORTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |