Drawing for RESONANCE

USPTO serial 74438794

RESONANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2131538Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 1998
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESONANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON SPENCER, FRANK & SCHNEIDER1100 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003housemark for a full line of beauty care preparations and non-medicated beauty care preparations for the bodySECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
005housemark for a full line of pharmaceutical homeopathic medicationsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
010medical devices, namely devices to determine the electrical resistances of the skin; electrical acupuncture devices; electric stimulus devices; stimulation current devicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2001C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 27, 2001CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2000CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 24, 1999PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 19971.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 23, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Mar 25, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 1996PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
May 6, 1996IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 6, 1996PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 24, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance