USPTO serial 74438820
HBPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HBPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY D KRUGMAN
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | blood substitutes; namely, oxygen transporting fluids for administration to humans and animals for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |