USPTO serial 74439102
CLUSTERWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLUSTERWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Halifax, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Craig Armstrong
R CRAIG ARMSTRONG CRAIG ARMSTRONG LAW OFFICE285 FOUNTAIN ST SCAMBRIDGE, ON N3H 1J2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | selection of computer hardware and software that allows a heterogeneous collection of networked computers to be configured and exploited to best serve the interactive, batch, serial and parallel computing, visualization, storage, archiving and database access needs of an enterprise, together with documentation and manuals and with all consulting, installation, systems and application development and training services that may be sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | Aug 4, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |