USPTO serial 74439739
SOFT TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFT TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry M. Levy
HARRY M LEVY EMRICH & DITHMARSTE 3000150 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |