Drawing for THE MASK

USPTO serial 74439803

THE MASK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MASK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin Komen

EDWIN KOMEN CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016stationery, calendars, pens, pencils and paint sets for children and artistsABANDONED—
022laundry bagsABANDONED—
024textile articles, namely bed spreads, pillow cases and sheetsABANDONED—
025men's, women's and children's apparel, namely sweatshirts, sweatpants, boxer shorts, tank tops, coats, jackets, sweaters, underwear, shorts, pants, shirts, blouses, dresses, skirts and footwearABANDONED—
028games and playthings, namely bendable figurines, role-playing activity games, word game puzzles and jigsaw puzzles, plush stuffed toys and accessories therefor, dye-cast models, inflatables, namely beach balls and bop bags in the nature of a children's inflatable play toy, decorative wind socks and accessories therefor, mechanical toys, and model kits comprising plastic, metal and wood pieces and related instructions sold as a unit for assembly as characters and scenes and beach toys, namely beach buckets, sand shovels and beach ballsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 13, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 31, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 23, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance