USPTO serial 74440260
ROXY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROXY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew F. Jodziewicz
MATTHEW F JODZIEWICZ CHAN & JODZIEWICZ777 S FIGUEROA ST 34TH FLP O BOX 17576LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-0576Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dried and preserved seafood, dried, preserved and canned fruits, fruit pastes, vegetable pastes, meat pastes, dried and canned mushrooms, pickled and canned vegetables, canned meats, dried and edible seeweed, canned fish, processed nuts and seeds, processed beans, dairy-based food beverages, dairy-based chocolate food beverages | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1984 |
| 030 | candies, biscuits, crackers, wafers, spices, sauces, noodles, food starch, flour, grain-based food beverages, herbal food beverages | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |