USPTO serial 74440637
MATHYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MATHYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-2544 Bettlach, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter C. Farley
WALTER C FARLEYSTE 6182730 UNIVERSITY BLVD WWHEATON, MD 20902-1949Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of bone diseases and defects; medical plaster; material for stopping teeth; bandages for skin wounds; bone cement; bone replacement material, namely hydroxyapatite and tricalciumphosphate granules and blocks; and veterinary pharmaceuticals for treating bone diseases and defects in large and small animals | ABANDONED | May 1, 1991 |
| 010 | surgical medical, dental and veterinary instruments and apparatus, namely bone drills, dental cutters, ratchets, instrument trays, surgical sutures and orthopedic surgical devices; dental implants, namely dental pins and screws, dental crowns, veneers, dental beams, dental bridges, attachments, space maintainers, and dental instruments for implanting the aforementioned; sugical and veterinary implants, namely artificial limbs, eyes, teeth, joint endoprostheses and hip endoprostheses | ABANDONED | May 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |