USPTO serial 74441310
APPLETON FARMS ESTABLISHED 1638 IPSWICH, MASSACHUSETTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPLETON FARMS ESTABLISHED 1638 IPSWICH, MASSACHUSETTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claire J. Holtz
CLAIRE J HOLTZ STOLPER, KORITZINSKY, BREWSTER & NEIDER7617 MINERAL POINT RDP O BOX 5510MADISON, WI 53705-0510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | manure, namely from livestock, with or without litter, fresh aged, or composted, or as a named component of soil amendment products and soil amendment products in the nature of animal manure composed primarily of animal manure with wood, plant materials, grains and fish or sea by product materials | ABANDONED | May 25, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |