USPTO serial 74444126
SYNOCURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2079511Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 1997
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYNOCURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92800 PUTEAUX, FR
F-92800 PUTEAUX, FR
92400 Courbevoie, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK HEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of paints and varnishes; resinous additives for paints; and dispersions of acrylic polymers in organic solvents for use in the manufacture of paints and varnishes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |