USPTO serial 74446039
AMBER FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMBER FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew F. Jodziewicz
MATTHEW F JODZIEWICZ3447 MANDEVILLE CANYON RDLOS ANGELES, CA 90049-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; fruit preserves, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; eggs, milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1990 |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and breakfast cereals, bread, pastry and bakery goods, flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; egg roll skins; noodles, and pasta; salad dressings | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |