USPTO serial 74446892
OTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICARDO, RANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melvin K. Silverman
MELVIN K SILVERMAN2455 E SUNRISE BLVD STE 410FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | sale of orthotic products including components thereof | ABANDONED | Jan 2, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |