USPTO serial 74446912
SAFESKIN SS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFESKIN SS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PCSTE 701 E555 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin soap, hand soap, sun tan lotion, sun block, sun screen skin creams, skin moisturizer, skin lotion, body lotion and sun screen lotion | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | anti-microbial emulsions and solutions in the nature of hospital/anti-microbial/protection cream, latex compatible hospital lotion, surgical scrub soap, surgical scrub lotion, surgical donning agent, health care anti-microbial/protection hand cream, consumer anti-microbial/protection hand cream, consumer anti-microbial/protection hand soap medicated skin soap, medicated hand soap, medicated sun burn soap, medicated skin cream, medicated skin moisturizer, medicated skin lotion, medicated body lotion, medicated facial lotion and medicated sun burn lotion | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 29, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |