USPTO serial 74446978
CANTINFLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANTINFLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
P.H., 06100, MX
P.H., 06100, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORA A MOFFATT
LORA A MOFFATT FRIED FRANK HARRIS SHRIVER & JACOBSONONE NEW YORK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | non-alcoholic beverages, namely dairy based food beverages and vegetable based food beverages; cheese products, namely cheese, cheese food, cheese spreads, cheese and cracker combinations and cheese substitutes; sauces, namely guacamole; dairy products, namely dairy-based dips, yogurt, whipping cream, milk, half 'n half; edible oils; processed fruits, vegetables, beans and nuts; proteins, namely meat, chicken, seafood and processed anchovies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |