USPTO serial 74448826
MICHELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICHELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-47798 Krefeld, DE
D-47798 Krefeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | cutlery, namely forks, table knives, and spoons; scissors; carving knives; non-electric fruit and vegetable corers; non-electric can openers; non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers; and serving forks | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | goods made of German silver, namely serving trays, serving platters, saucers, pitchers, and serving bowls; and household utensils made of German silver, namely spatulas, whisks, graters, bottle openers, non-electric juicers, serving tongs, serving spoons, and serving ladles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |