Drawing for CLEANMACHINE

USPTO serial 74449817

CLEANMACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASIELLO, ANTHO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANMACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill Anderfuren

JILL ANDERFUREN TILTON, FALLON, LUNGMUS & CHESTNUT100 S WACKER DR STE 960CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric pressure washers and machine parts for electric pressure washers, namely sandblaster attachments, foam wands, angle wands, straight extension wands, turbo wands, and extension hosesABANDONEDJun 24, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 9, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 21, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 13, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 27, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 24, 1994IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 14, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 1, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance