USPTO serial 74449912
BAKING BUTTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAKING BUTTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan A. Geurts
BRYAN A GEURTS SNOW, CHRISTENSEN & MARTINEAU10 EXCHANGE PL ELEVENTH FLPOST OFFICE BOX 45000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-5000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bakery products that are low in fat and nutritions, bread mixes, muffins, cookies low fat pastries, and frozen bakery items low in fat, baking butter will be the name of the low fat replacement for baking | ABANDONED | Apr 24, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 1994 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |