USPTO serial 74450440
BAR-B-Q EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 1996
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAR-B-Q EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur W. Fisher, III
ARTHUR W FISHER IIISTE 3165553 W WATERS AVETAMPA, FL 33634Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 21, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 31, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |