USPTO serial 74451622
5 INN TOUCH SPEEDIAL SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 5 INN TOUCH SPEEDIAL SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stockport, Cheshire, SK3 0BD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Dillon
JOAN L DILLON KING & SPALDING191 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30303-1763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the services of local businesses by providing to the clientele of hotels, motels and short-term residential establishments in the area a short-code direct-dialling telephone service and customized directory card therefor to pre-subscribed local businesses to enable the clientele to access said pre-subscribed local businesses | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | providing a short-code direct-dialling telephone service and customized directory card therefor to the clientele of hotels, motels and short-term residential establishments to enable the clientele to access pre-subscribed local businesses which provide personal care, secretarial, transportation, cleaning, medical, dental and other personal services thereto | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |