USPTO serial 74452384
DURALUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURALUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOUSTON, TX
STAMFORD, CT
STAMFORD, CT
Houston, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER S. REICHERTZ
PETER S REICHERTZ ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical gasoline and motor oil additives, namely, synthetic engine treatment and synthetic engine formula | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | automobile fuel system cleaning preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | oils and lubricants, namely, non-chemical additives for automotive, marine, recreational vehicle, motorcycle, and truck use in the nature of engine treatment, engine formula, transmission treatment (automatic and manual), transmission formula (automatic and manual), gear oil (automatic), fuel treatment, octane boost, fuel system formula, fuel stabilizer, oil additive, oil enhancer, oil viscosity enhancer, oil thickener, synthetic gear oil and synthetic oil | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SLICK 50 MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-LUBE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-LUBE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Petrolon Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named DURALUBE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |