USPTO serial 74452612
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon E. Porter, Jr.
LEON E PORTER JRPOST OFFICE BOX 2760WINSTON SALEM, NC 27102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | hosiery, pantyhose, tights, knee-highs and socks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |