USPTO serial 74453107
DURA LUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 1998
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DURA LUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STAMFORD, CT
Gahanna, OH
STAMFORD, CT
Houston, TX
STAMFORD, CT
STAMFORD, CT
Houston, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Barnett
Melissa A. Barnett Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLPSte. 290041 S. High StreetColumbus, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical gasoline and motor oil additives, namely, synthetic engine treatment and synthetic engine formula | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | automobile fuel system cleaning preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | oils and lubricants, namely, non-chemical additives for automotive, marine, recreational vehicle, motorcycle, and truck use in the nature of engine treatment engine formula, transmisson treatment (automatic and manual), transmission formula (automatic and manual), gear oil (automatic), fuel treatment, octane boost, fuel system formula, fuel stabilizer, oil additive, oil enhancer, oil viscosity enhancer, oil thickener, synthetic gear oil, and synthetic oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-LUBE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DURA LUBE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-LUBE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SLICK 50 MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGH REV PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-LUBE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Petrolon Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named DURA LUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |