USPTO serial 74453299
THE VOICE OF REASON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE VOICE OF REASON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald A. Kaul
DONALD A KAUL BROWNSTEIN ZEIDMAN AND LORE, PC1401 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing sales promotion services to automotive dealers through the distribution of printed promotional materials, sound and/or video recordings and by rendering merchandising and sales promotion advice | ABANDONED | Jan 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |