Drawing for GREAT VALUE

USPTO serial 74453388

GREAT VALUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUN, JEAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREAT VALUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet F Satterthwaite

JANET F SATTERTHWAITE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cleaning preparations for general household useABANDONED—
016plastic trash bags plastic food wrap; gift wrapping paper; and stationary; namely, writing paper and drawing paper, envelopes, self-sticking note paper; and pens and pencilsABANDONED—
029chili and chili mixes, prepared pork and beans, and dried beans prepared beef stew; processed nuts; non-dairy creamers; dairy based chip and vegetable dipsABANDONED—
030custard and custard mixes; puddings and pudding mixes; gelatin dessert mixes; frosting and frosting mixes; pies, marshmallows; frozen burritos and pizza; snack foods; namely, frozen cheese puffs and popped popcorn; prepared stuffing and stuffing mixes containing bread; and prepared pasta; ice milk and frozen ice cream dessert novelties, namely ice pops and ice cream barsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 25, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance