USPTO serial 74453648
REUTER EQUATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REUTER EQUATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London EC4P 4AJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol A. Motyka
CAROL A MOTYKA WEIL, GOTSHALL & MANGES767 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for financial analysis; blank magnetic disks, optical disks, compact disks, computer tapes and computer cards; computer hardware; computer wires; calculators; computer peripherals and parts for the aforementioned | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | providing financial information and financial analysis with the aid of computer systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | renting and leasing computers and computer software; leasing access time to a computer data base in the field of financial information and analysis; updating of computer software; computer programming for others; consultancy in the fields of computer hardware and software; computer software design for others; providing technical assistance to others in the field of computer usage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |