Drawing for BIGELOW

USPTO serial 74454818

BIGELOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1926980Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 1995
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BIGELOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie Barney

Valerie Barney Mohawk160 South Industrial Blvd.Calhoun, GA 30701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027carpets and rugsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2026CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Oct 17, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Apr 13, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 13, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 10, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2015RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 10, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 10, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 15, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 24, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 24, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 22, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 9, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 9, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 9, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Oct 12, 2005E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2001C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 17, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 17, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 30, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 30, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 21, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance