Drawing for SCRUBBLE

USPTO serial 74455036

SCRUBBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCRUBBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Raymond Felton

W RAYMOND FELTON GREENBAUM, ROWE, SMITH, RAVIN & DAVIS99 WOOD AVE SP O BOX 5600WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021household, commercial and industrial sponges, cloths, wipes and scrubbers with and without coasted abrasive or nylon fiber surfacesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 1995ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 2, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance