Drawing for UNIVERSAL CITYWALK

USPTO serial 74456044

UNIVERSAL CITYWALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODPASTER, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIVERSAL CITYWALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl M. Friedman

CHERYL M FRIEDMAN100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys and games; namely, action figures and accessories therefor, bathtub toys, kites, toy building blocks, board games, and costume masks, hand-held unit for playing electronic games, die cast miniature vehicles, dolls, doll accessories, doll clothing, bean bag dolls, bendable play figures, flying disks, inflatable vinyl play figures, jigsaw puzzles, marbles, plush toys, puppets, ride-on toys, skateboards, balloons, rollerskates, toy banks, water squirting doll heads, stuffed toys, toy vehicles, yo-yo's, Christmas tree ornaments, computer game programs, video game cartridges, video game tape cassettes, pinball machines and model craft kits of toy figuresABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 1996EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 23, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 15, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 8, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance