USPTO serial 74456519
ROYAL COOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2005463Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 1996
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROYAL COOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Weiss
ROBERT C WEISS LYON & LYONFIRST INTERSTATE WORLD CTR633 W FIFTH ST STE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2066Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | kitchen utensils, namely kitchen knives, and tableware, namely knives, forks, and spoons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 19, 1988 |
| 021 | cookware, namely pots, pans, kettles, colanders for household use, griddles, steamer baskets and containers for foods, dishes, dinnerware, and spatulas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 19, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FARAMARZIPOUR U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FARAMARZIPOUR U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FARAMARZIPOUR U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ROYAL COOK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |