USPTO serial 74456788
CORDANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORDANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry T. Jones, Jr.
HARRY T JONES JR HOGAN & HARTSON555 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for use in connection with the integrity and security of computer systems and networks; video, audio and related equipment in the area of telecommunications, namely analog codecs, T-1 and higher band width digital codecs twisted pair, coaxial, and fiber optic cable, analog and digital, and fiber optic transmitters, echo suppressors, PC-screen projectors, cameras, microphones, video cards, video monitors, electromechanical pens for use with computers, telewriter transmitters and receivers, multipoint video and audio conference bridges, and analog and digital voice, data, image, and video switches | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1992 |
| 035 | procurement, namely purchasing computer hardware and software and telecommunications equipment for others | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1992 |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of computer and or telecommunications systems | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1992 |
| 041 | training, namely classes in the area of computer and telecommunications systems | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1992 |
| 042 | engineering, consulting and design of integrated computer systems, software and telecommunications systems, namely the design, developments, and testing for others of such systems and software; consulting and design of computer network security systems; and information services in the field of telecmmunications | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cordant, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CORDANT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |