USPTO serial 74456882
TENNESSEE GLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TENNESSEE GLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
I - 41012 CARPI (Modena), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely bath robes, bathing caps, bathing drawers, bathing suits, beach clothes, belts, berets; caps, chemisettes, coats, combinations; dress shields, dressing gowns; gabardines; hats, headbands, headgear for wear; jackets, jerseys, jumpers; knitwear; motorists' clothing; outerclothing, overcoats, overalls; pants, parkas, pelerines, polo necks, pullovers, pajamas; shirts, shorts, skirts, slips, smocks, sport jerseys, stuff jackets, suits; top hats, trousers, trousers straps, tee shirts; underclothing, underpants; vests; waterproof clothing; footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |