USPTO serial 74457201
ASHTON MINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASHTON MINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWA LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management services for others relating to the exploration, evaluation, and development of mines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | prospecting and mining of gems; planning, designing, and engineering services for others relating to the exploration, evaluation, and development of mines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHTON MINING OF CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHTON MINING OF CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASHTON MINING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |