USPTO serial 74457349
AM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1H2, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1H2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWA LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management services for others relating to the exploration, evaluation, development, mining, processing and marketing of mines and of diamonds and gems | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | processing of gems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | prospecting and mining of gems, gem wholesale and retail distributorship services, planning, designing and engineering services for others relating to the exploration, evaluation, development, mining, processing and marketing of mines and of diamonds and gems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHTON MINING OF CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHTON MINING OF CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |