Drawing for HARVEY NICHOLS

USPTO serial 74457415

HARVEY NICHOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HARVEY NICHOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Lynn Perry

E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND KHOURIE AND CREWSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029meat, fish, crustacea for human consumption; shellfish for human consumption; food game for human consumption; meat extracts; preserved, dried cooked and frozen fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams, fruit preserves; eggs; milk; dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; food products made from fish, meat, poultry, fruit and vegetables, namely baked beans, banana chips, roast beef, chicken and dumplings, clam juice, chowder, meat jellies and fruit chips; fruit based snack foodsABANDONED—
030coffee; tea; cocoa, rice; sugar; tapioca; sago; coffee substitutes; flour; preparations made from flour, namely pie crusts, dumplings and dough; breakfast cereals, processed cereals, ready to eat cereal-derived food bars and cereal based snack foods; bread; biscuits; cakes; pastry; pastries; ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; frozen confections, candies and confectionery chips for baking; chocolate; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; pepper; vinegar; sauces; spices; iceABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 15, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 25, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance