Drawing for THERAPEUTIC CORNEAPLASTY

USPTO serial 74457585

THERAPEUTIC CORNEAPLASTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERAPEUTIC CORNEAPLASTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of damaged or diseased eyesABANDONED—
042medical services; namely, repair of the eyeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 7, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 11, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 17, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 29, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 29, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 26, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance