USPTO serial 74457761
N S U ICE AGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with N S U ICE AGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Thornton
ROBERT R THORNTON CARLSMITH BALL WICHMAN MURRAY CASE MUKAI444 S FLOWER ST 9TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | outerwear, namely jackets and pants, and shirts and hats | ABANDONED | Dec 16, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |