Drawing for DERIVATIVE-ENHANCED ASSET-LINKED SECURITIES

USPTO serial 74457918

DERIVATIVE-ENHANCED ASSET-LINKED SECURITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEETZOW, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERIVATIVE-ENHANCED ASSET-LINKED SECURITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin A. Griffin

KEVIN A GRIFFIN CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON1752 N ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely creation and issuance of trust certificates that represent and interest in debt securities combined with a derivativeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 27, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1994ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance