USPTO serial 74458353
CHOCOCINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOCOCINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-54169 Bergisch Gladbach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert V. Vickers
ROBERT V VICKERS VICKERS, DANIELS & YOUNG2000 TERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | preparations for making flavored drinks, namely a drink having the flavor of cocoa and coffee | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |